Climate Change   

How Climate Change and Gender Inequality Go Hand in Hand

Vanessa Valenti March 15, 2010 - 1:13 pm

Comment ( 1 )  

While war, poverty, health and a range of other pressing global issues affect women worldwide, climate wouldn't be one of the first you'd think of. Well, think again.

According to new research conducting the United Nations, Women's Environment and Development Organization (WEDO) and the University of London, climate change severely impacts women's lives and contributes to the already existing gender inequalities that exist across the globe. Inhabitat picked it up:

For example, Amy North, a researcher at the University of London’s Institute of Education, notes that in sub-Saharan Africa, women are responsible for collecting water and firewood. Decreased rainfall brought on by climate change will undoubtedly make these resources more scarce. Women will need to spend more and more time searching for these items, meaning they’ll have less time to engage in money-making activities or attend school. In Kenya, poverty brought on by drought has been linked to a decrease in school attendance, and parents are more likely to withdraw girls from school than boys.

In Uganda, “famine marriages” are all too common. Less rainfall brings agricultural losses, which means increased poverty in rural areas that depend on farming. To combat this poverty, many families are marrying off their daughters at younger and younger ages in order to secure a dowry or bride price. As climate change continues to spur drought and agricultural losses, the situation may only get worse for women.

In short, we have to recognize that issues like water, food and energy are all women's issues. It's necessary for foks to recognize that and begin to address issues of gender when discussing climate change. Check out the entire report, it's pretty eye-opening. 

 

Nepal to hold cabinet meeting at base of Everest

Mark Leon Goldberg November 2, 2009 - 3:09 pm

Comment ( 2 )  

First, the Maldives held an underwater cabinet meeting, now the Nepalese government will show the perils of climate change to the Himalayan glaciers by convening the cabinet at 17,500 feet.   

The entire cabinet of the 22-party coalition will move to the Everest base camp at an altitude of 17,585 feet later this month for the landmark meeting, said Forests Minister Deepak Bohora.

According to the minister, the cabinet meeting at the Everest Base Camp ahead of the key UN summit on December 7-18 aims to focus the attention of the international community to the impact of climate change on the Himalayas and the people dependent on its resources.

The Himalyas are sometimes refered to as the "water tower of Asia" because mountain glaciers provide the water source for rivers from China to Burma to India, which in turn accounts for about half the world's population.  Unfortunately, the  IPCCC has found that the glaciers are receding fast.   Unless this trend is abated, we may see a major water crisis around the corner. 

 

Photo, flickr

 

Barcelona: Last stop before Copenhagen

November 2, 2009 - 10:14 am

Comment ( 0 )  

n/a 

Barcelona: Last stop before Copenhagen

November 2, 2009 - 10:03 am

Comment ( 1 )  

Ed note: This post is from Abhishek Nayak, who is part of the Indian Youth Delegation to the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. Abishek recently deferred a semester to work as a researcher and analyst at the India office of New Energy Finance, world's leading provider of information and analysis in clean technology and carbon markets. He was also part of the founding team of Dhanax 's business to introduce retail investment in microcredit. He was a speaker at the FORTUNE Global Forum, 2007 and a student delegate to the 39th St Gallen symposium. He is currently an undergraduate at BITS-Pilani, India.  We are excited to have Abhishek joining the Dipsatch team.

 

This week at the Barcelona Climate Change talks, Yve de Boer, UN's top climate change official, will attempt to decrease the growing rift between the developed and the developing nations that threatens to sabotage all hopes of reaching an interim agreement at Copenhagen.

All nations agree to the fundamental principle of 'common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities' that is the basis of all climate change negotiations, but there is very little agreement on the details of these responsibilities and recognition of capabilities. A major contention arose at the Bangkok meeting in September when some negotiators from developing nations walked out mid-way during the Canadian keynote which proposed scrapping the Kyoto Protocol and starting anew with a new framework for negotiations. A few major developed nations believe the Kyoto Protocol is an inadequate framework to achieve a comprehensive and 'fair' international deal.

Under the Kyoto Protocol the developed nations, officially termed as annex 1 countries, need to commit to making emission cuts and provide financing for adaptation in developing nations. Only a few annex 1 countries have passed national bills to target the ambitious emission cuts of 25%-40% of 1990 levels as proposed by the non-annex 1 countries. The annex 1 countries have a high target for emission cuts by 2050 but only weak targets for 2020. The island nations, which are especially vulnerable to rising sea levels, find this lack of commitment disconcerting and are accusing the developed world for not doing enough.

 There is also tremendous political pressure from the annex 1 countries on major developing world polluters like China and India, which are the largest and fourth largest CO2 emitters, to accept binding emission cuts. Both of these countries have made in abundantly clear that binding cuts are unacceptable under the Kyoto Protocol and unfair to their citizens whose per capita emissions are much lesser than the per capita emissions in the developed world.

 The EU recently agreed that there's a need to provide 100bn euros(($148bn; £90bn) a year till 2020, but the members are still divided on the details of sharing the burden of this financial support for climate change mitigation and adaptation in developing countries. Non-annex 1 countries find this number to be inadequate especially when there's a possibility that much of these funding would come from existing international aid budgets. The developing nations consider this financial support to be an entitlement and not equal to aid which is not without merit considering that developed nations are majorly responsible for climate change effects.

 Over the next five weeks before the Copenhagen summit, negotiators need to reach common ground on some of these issues which are crucial to reaching a comprehensive climate treaty.

 

Don't tell George Will or Dubner or Levitt

Mark Leon Goldberg October 27, 2009 - 10:58 am

Comment ( 3 )  

In a Washington Post column in February George Will attacked the commonly held scientific consensus on global warming and argued that recent trends actually show that global cooling is occurring.  His argument was swiftly refuted by the very research organization, the University of Illinois Arctic Climate Research Center, from which he drew his data.  Nevertheless, he doubled down on his flat-earth thesis in a follow-up column.

In recent days the global cooling thesis has once again emerged, this time proffered by the the 0h-so-contrarian authors of Super Freakonomics.   The problem, as it always was, is that this is a total canard.   

Via EnviroKnow, Seth Borenstein of the Associated Press showed four  independent statisticians data on global temperatures, without telling the statisticians what the figures they were looking at represented.  The experts found no true declines over time. From the AP:

Statisticians who analyzed the data found a distinct decades-long upward trend in the numbers, but could not find a significant drop in the past 10 years in either data set. The ups and downs during the last decade repeat random variability in data as far back as 1880.

Saying there's a downward trend since 1998 is not scientifically legitimate, said David Peterson, a retired Duke University statistics professor and one of those analyzing the numbers.

 Identifying a downward trend is a case of "people coming at the data with preconceived notions," said Peterson, author of the book "Why Did They Do That? An Introduction to Forensic Decision Analysis."

 

Something to think about next time someone tries to serve up the global cooling fabrication. 

 

Tim Wirth on taking action on climate change during a recession

Mark Leon Goldberg October 23, 2009 - 11:19 am

Comment ( 3 )  

UN Foundation chief Tim Wirth cuts a video for the UK foreign office  100 Voices in a 100 days campaign.

 

New York Post takes on climate change--not

Mark Leon Goldberg September 21, 2009 - 10:21 am

Comment ( 1 )  

Thousands of New Yorkers received free copies of a special edition of the New York Post this morning dedicated to the dangers of climate change and the need for robust international action to combat it.  For the unawares, the New York Post is a Murdoch owned-tabloid that tends to scew on the "climate change is myth" side of the spectrum, so I was mighty shocked to see an entire issue dedicated to climate change ahead of the UN climate summit tomorrow. 

The only problem, though, is that it was a spoof.  The Yes Men are responsible. 

 

 

Civil Disobedience

Mark Leon Goldberg September 9, 2009 - 11:04 am

Comment ( 1 )  

About a year ago, Al Gore urged citizens to take direct action and called for civil disobedience to prevent the construction of new coal-fired power plants. 

It seems that a group of activists in West Virginia are taking this call to heart. Via ItsGettingHotinHere, activists from the group ClimateGroundZero are staging a blockade at the headquarters of coal giant the Massey Energy Company. Four activists, ranging in age from 22 to 81 are blocking the road to Massey Energy headquarters to protest the companies practice of Mountain Top Removal mining, a particularly vile method of mining.  

Daryl Hannah and Climate scientist James Hansen were arrested in a similar protest in West Virginia earlier this summer. 

 

Brothers Miliband take the climate show on the road

Mark Leon Goldberg September 8, 2009 - 1:09 pm

Comment ( 1 )  

UK Foreign Secretary David Miliband and his brother, Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband are sounding the alarm that a climate deal in Copenhagen in December may fall apart unless countries get their act together. 

David Miliband told reporters in London that the complexity of negotiations and disputes between industrialized and developing nations over cuts to emissions threaten to scupper a deal.

"The deal the world needs in Copenhagen is now in the balance," he said. "There's a real danger the talks scheduled for December will not reach a positive outcome, and an equal danger in the run-up to Copenhagen that people don't wake up to the danger of failure until it's too late."

Here is David Miliband explaining some of the international security risks of unabated global warming.

 

That's his brother to the left. The two are taking this presentation to a number of European cities this week and are in the midst of a big media push. All the power to them.

 

  • Related Sites
  • UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATIONS
  • UN WIRE
  • Join Us On
  • t
  • f