Health
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB, and Malaria is making do with less
Alanna Shaikh November 18, 2009 - 2:05 am
The Center for Global Development’s excellent Global Health Policy blog noted today the huge resource deficit that the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TD, and Malaria is currently facing -- a $2.6 billion funding gap over the next two years.
To cover those cuts, the Global Fund is taking ten percent off the top of all grants, calling it an “efficiency cut.” In my own experience, that will work for the first round or two, and then everyone will just start gaming the system by padding their grant requests. They are also only committing to pay 90 percent of grant funding and are assuming they’ll find a way to fill in the other 10 percent in the next two years. Finally, they’re probably going to delay grant approvals until more funding is available.
It adds up to the erosion of funding for HIV, TB, and Malaria, at a time when the money is needed more than ever. All three of those illnesses are made worse by poverty. In a time of global financial crisis the need is heightened not lessened.
Swine flu and panic in Ukraine
Alanna Shaikh November 18, 2009 - 12:58 am
There are a lot of rumors coming out of Ukraine right now about a new form of swine flu, a brand new illness, or some kind of virulent pneumonia. I suspect it’s no more than swine flu with complications, but it’s causing some major panic in Kiev.
Britain’s Daily Express newspaper has the terrified tabloid version. They report that “A cocktail of three flu viruses are reported to have mutated into a single pneumonic plague, which it is believed may be far more dangerous than swine flu. The death toll has reached 189 and more than 1 million people have been infected.” The New York Times has a slightly more nuanced report. They identify the mystery illness as swine flu and quote a WHO official who says that “Early findings are that serious cases mounted because the sick avoided hospitalization until their illness was dangerously advanced, stockpiles of Tamiflu were locked in centralized locations and the supply of ventilators fell short.”
I suspect that the WHO and the New York Times have it right. There are a lot of barriers to access to health care in Ukraine, under-the-table payments being one of the biggest. I can well imagine people refusing to go to a doctor until their lungs were past saving. Avian Flu diary agrees, attributing the unusual severity to viral hemorrhagic pneumonia as a complication of swine flu. They also have an enlightening comment at the bottom of their post from a commenter in Ukraine watching the situation unfold.
Secrecy is not helping the government of Ukraine here. In a nation with a history of cover-ups – Chernobyl being the most famous – the population is quick to panic when they sense that they’re not getting the real story. Getting the real story out as fast as possible and backing it up with access to medical care – is the only way to stop the panic.
Afghanistan prepares to fight swine flu
Alanna Shaikh November 15, 2009 - 1:04 pm
Afghanistan's first death from swine flu was reported on October 18. Since then, at least ten more people have died in Kabul, the LA Times reports. The news gets worse; the Afghanistan ministry of health has estimated that swine flu could infect up to 22% of the country’s population. That’s 6.6 million people, of which 330,000 are likely to develop severe complications. That’s more than Afghanistan’s struggling health system can handle.
There are only 50,000 doses of anti-viral medicine available in Afghanistan. At present, there are no vaccine stocks. The World Health Organization has promised swine flu vaccine to the Afghan Ministry of Health, but none has yet arrived.
Mortality rates from swine flu, even with complications, have been low in the U.S. and Europe. In Mexico, however, they were much higher. Conditions in Afghanistan – crowded, impoverished, and malnourished -- are far more like those in Mexico than the wealthy world. Afghanistan could well be looking at a mortality rate of 6-7 percent, like Mexico's.
So far, the Afghan government is focusing on awareness and isolation to reduce the threat of swine flu. There are radio and television campaigns encouraging people to stay at home if they’re showing swine flu symptoms and to avoid shaking hands and embracing. Schools, universities, and public restrooms have been closed down, as have sports clubs and wedding halls.
Reducing and eliminating crowds is a good first step to preventing the spread of swine flu. It was a big part of what helped Mexico slow the pandemic. However, it’s not anywhere near enough. Afghanistan is going to need vaccine and anti-virals as weapons in the fight against swine flu. And even if they get those, the health system may not be strong enough to wield them successfully.
100 million children vaccinated each year; not enough
Alanna Shaikh October 22, 2009 - 4:26 am
The World Health Organization has released a new report on childhood immunization. It holds a surprising amount of good news. We’ve got more vaccines, and more effective vaccines, than ever before. The number of child deaths is falling globally. However, despite the good news, 20% of children – mainly in Africa and Asia - are still not getting the full set of vaccines.
So what do we do about it? The WHO estimates that it will cost an additional $76 billion through 2015 to protect 90% of children, and get to herd immunity, in 117 low- and middle- income UN member states. This would mean vaccinating them for 14 illnesses - diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, measles, polio, tuberculosis, hepatitis B, Hib, rubella, meningococcal disease, pneumococcal disease, rotavirus, Japanese encephalitis (where needed), and yellow fever. This would save the lives of 2 million children a year.
The question, I guess, at this point comes down to whether the world community willing to spend $6300 per child’s life?
If you’re wondering how it can cost so much to deliver vaccines, it’s because we need more than just the vaccines themselves to immunize a child. You need a health system capable of tracking children so they know to vaccinate them, a health worker to do the vaccination, and a logistics system capable of keeping the vaccines cold until they’re delivered. The 20% of kids left insufficiently vaccinated are the ones who are hard to reach; it’s going to take a major investment in health systems to get to them.
A View from the 'Stans
Mark Leon Goldberg October 6, 2009 - 2:52 pm
Our very own Alanna Shaikh makes her blogging heads debut. Our woman in Tajikstan discusses the politics of the 'stans and major health issues facing the region. She is joined by Sundaa Bridget Jones of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Saudi Arabia v. Polio II
Dan Carucci October 3, 2009 - 8:30 am
I was pleased to see Alanna Shaikh comment on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s generous gift, and critical commitment to help us move closer to global polio eradication. Ms. Shaikh noted in her commentary, there are Muslim populations which have been reluctant to take advantage of the polio vaccine, due to false rumors that it may lead to infertility or the spread of HIV. It is these misconceptions which make the efforts of Saudi Arabia to dispel myths and require vaccination for every Haj Pilgrim momentous.
To be clear, while no vaccine is infallible, the benefits of the polio vaccine far outweigh its risks. In the last ten years, more than 10 billion doses of the vaccine have been given and have protected against a life of misery. Of these ten billion people who are now protected from the wild polio virus, 383 of them contracted vaccine-derived polio. That amounts to a risk of less than one in 10 million. With this ratio in mind, I believe that it would be difficult to for anyone to suggest that to make the vaccine mandatory for Haj Pilgrims is to put them at additional risk.
In the 1980s, polio paralyzed at least 1,000 children EVERY DAY all over the world. Due to polio vaccine efforts during the last ten years, the wild polio virus has taken a greatly reduced toll. In 2008, there were only 1,300 cases for the entire year, worldwide. Today, after international efforts to immunize every child everywhere, five million people are walking who would otherwise be paralyzed and the world is almost polio-free. Polio remains endemic in four countries—Nigeria, India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. We are hopeful that this directive from Saudi Arabia, will be one of the final, crucial steps toward eliminating polio globally.
Dan Carucci is the VP of Global Health at the UN Foundation
Saudi Arabia vs Polio
Alanna Shaikh September 30, 2009 - 9:18 am

We wrote about this last week, and The New York Times reported yesterday that Saudi Arabia is going to ask every haj pilgrim to Mecca to take the oral polio vaccine in front of Saudi health officials. This is excellent public health news, but it also illustrates the ways that health and human rights come together in strange ways.
On one hand, Muslims have shown distrust for the polio vaccine, with devastating results. In 2004, officials in the Muslim Nigeria state of Kano refused to allow children to be vaccinated. They believed that the vaccine would make the children infertile and/or spread AIDS. This led to a polio outbreak that spread to 15 countries and put over ten million children at risk. For Saudi Arabia, home of the holiest Muslim sites, to require polio vaccine is a powerful message of support for the vaccine. In addition, the polio vaccine requires a certain percentage of people to be vaccinated before it works. About two million people make haj every year; getting them vaccinated has to help with "herd immunity."
On the other hand, those two million people come from a whole lot of different countries. They won’t make that much difference to their vaccination rates at home. And the oral polio vaccine has risks. It can cause outbreaks of vaccine-derived polio. There have been 383 cases of vaccine-derived polio in the last ten years. Vaccinating haj pilgrims reduces their risk of getting wild polio but exposes them to the entirely new risk of vaccine-derived polio. Since making haj is a religious requirement for devout Muslims, you could argue that requiring the vaccination and attendant risks is coercive.
The Saudi authorities have decided that the large symbolic value of vaccinating haj pilgrims for polio, and the lesser epidemiological value, outweigh the risk to individuals of vaccine derived polio. I think they’re right, and it certainly fits with Islamic values of community. But it wasn’t a choice without trade-offs.
Saudi to require polio vaccine for Hajj pilgrims
Mark Leon Goldberg September 23, 2009 - 10:07 am
At the Clinton Global Initiative, The United Nations Foundation (which supports this blog) and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia announced a $30 million program to eradicate polio.
As it stands, polio is close to being wiped off the map. There were only some 1650 cases reported in 2008. About 90% of those cases originated from countries where polio remains endemic: India, Nigeria, Pakistan and Afghanistan. The money will largely directed to polio eradication campaigns in those four countries.
Interestingly, as part of the commitment to eradicate polio, Saudi Arabia announced that it is requiring every pilgrim entering Mecca will to receive the polio vaccine. From the release.
In addition to the financial commitment, Saudi Arabia, the Keeper of the Two Holy Mosques, is also requiring every pilgrim entering the Kingdom for the Hajj, the annual pilgrimage to Mecca, to receive a polio vaccination. By raising awareness about the importance of polio immunizations among Muslim pilgrims, the Kingdom is helping to dispel misconceptions about the safety of vaccines and is underscoring that polio immunizations are not only appropriate, but essential.
Learn more about the Global Polio Eradication Initiative.
Video: The WHO disease early warning system
Mark Leon Goldberg September 17, 2009 - 1:15 pm
A short film from the World Health Organization shows how its disease early warning system works amidst a refugee crisis in Pakistan









DISPATCH TWEETS











Rumors and neglected tropical diseases
Alanna Shaikh November 19, 2009 - 12:00 pm
Comment ( 0 )
It’s nice to see a mystery solved. We just saw some major panic in Indonesia about a treatment for a neglected tropical disease. The Jakarta Post reported this morning that, after a mass administration of drugs to fight lymphatic filariasis, “those treated by the drugs started to die or fall ill by the hundreds.” They ran the story under a headline that said “Did Disease-Fighting Drugs Do More Harm Than Good?”
The news has been spread by worried Indonesian bloggers, and no one seems to believe the denials from the Indonesia Ministry of Health. According to the Post, “Health Minister Endang Rahayu Sedyaningsih was quick to deny the deaths were caused by the drugs, saying only that some underlying diseases were the probable cause.”
If it’s true that the treatment, a combination of the drugs DEC and albendazole, is dangerous, that’s bad stuff. Lymphatic filariasis is also known as elephantiasis and it causes serious suffering and social stigma. A billion people are at risk for it. Treating it is important work.
It turns, out, however, that DEC and albendazole actually carry some unpleasant side effects, especially for people who are infected. In particular, headaches, nausea, and fever - often quite severe. They’re not long-lasting, or dangerous. Just very unpleasant.
All of this points to the importance of educating people about the treatments they are getting. If there had been some clear discussion of the likely side effects, people would have expected their symptoms. A mass hysteria could have been stopped before it began.