Activists: Sudan policy review good on paper. Now what?
Mark Leon Goldberg - October 19, 2009 - 12:59 pm
Sudan activists John Prendergast of the Enough Project, Randy Newcomb of Humanity United, Sam Bell of the Genocide Intervention Network and Jerry Fowler of Save Darfur just held a conference call for reporters in which they offered their reactions to the Sudan policy review.
The group was pleased that the policy review was finally completed after such a long delay. The activists agreed that, on paper, it says the right things. The big question now is whether or not it will actually be implemented.
John Prendergast said the policy was "worthy of support" and that it moves the United States "from a policy of appeasement to one of principled and conditional engagement." The next key U.S. objective, said Prendergast, is building a broad multi-lateral coalition around implementing the policy. "The U.S. policy looks good on paper," he said. "But it will go up in smoke as Sudan burns if it is not followed through to the letter."
Prendergast's point about the necessity of building a broad international coalition to support this policy was echoed by the other speakers. Jerry Fowler urged Obama to use his international popularity to help build multi-lateral support for the policy. He said that one indicator of whether or not this coalition-building is really happening can be seen in whether or not President Obama raises the issue with Chinese President Hu Jintao when Obama visits China next month.
Based on the call, I would say that activists are no more trustful of the Obama administration's approach to Sudan than they were prior to the policy review. Sam Bell, for example, suggested that President Obama's absence from the roll out this morning was an indicator of the relatively low priority afforded to Sudan issues inside the White House. To be sure, each of the activist leaders agreed with Prendergast's assessment that the policy strikes the right balance between peace, protecting vulnerable populations, and accountability for war crimes. There is, however, a definite wait-and-see attitude concerning whether or not this policy will be effectively implemented.
Subscribe to these comments









DISPATCH TWEETS










Devid @ Mar 18th 2010 7:06AM
I was very pleased to find this site.I wanted to thank you for this great read.
ucvhost | windows vps | ucvhost
REPLY »
hduFdddsFgddDer @ Mar 16th 2010 1:28PM
alanya otelleri alanya otelleri
alanya pansiyon alanya pansiyon
avşa adası pansiyon avşa pansiyon
bodrum otelleri bodrum otelleri
bodrum pansiyon bodrum pansiyon
REPLY »
SAMJAM @ Mar 16th 2010 1:17PM
i wouldn’t have said this had been useful several years ago and yet it is amusing the way age adjusts the manner you experience many creative concepts, thanks with regard to the blog post it is actually nice to read something intelligent occasionally in lieu of the popular crap mascarading as blogs on the net, cheers
sell gold | Merchant Cash Advance
REPLY »
Visitor @ Mar 12th 2010 5:02PM
güvercin
is ilanlari
metal gruplari
semsiye
sezlong
sandalye
armut koltuk
cam balkon
video izle
bean bags
ogretmen
izle
video tube
antalya airport transfer
Free English Essay
REPLY »
dispatcher @ Oct 20th 2009 10:26AM
For the time being, the U.S. remains the world's superpower. As such we have both a moral obligation and a direct interest in ending the violence in Sudan.
REPLY »