U.S. Senate rejects false choice between supporting veterans and UN Funding

Mark Leon Goldberg - November 20, 2009 - 11:30 am

Yesterday afternoon the Senate defeated an amendment to the Veterans Affairs funding bill that would have taken money U.S. contributions to UN peacekeeping and other UN programs to offset costs for extended benefits to U.S. Veterans. The amendment, which was sponsored by Oklahoma Republican Tom Coburn, was defeated by a 66-32 vote.  Nine Republicans voted to defeat the amendment, and one Democrat (Evan Bayh of Indiana), voted in favor.  

The State Department came out vigorously against this proposal, saying that it made little sense to cut our contributions to the IAEA, which is monitoring nuclear activity in Iran and North Korea, the UN, which is organizing elections in Iraq and Afghanistan, or UN Peacekeeping, which has 17 on-going peacekeeping operations around the world.  Thankfully, the senate rejected the false choice between these important American national security priorities and support for American veterans.  

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1) Subscribe to these comments
Add Your Comments
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.
  • Related Sites
  • UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATIONS
  • UN WIRE
  • Join Us On
  • t
  • f